Sections

Blocked: Civic gurus pan LICH developer’s proposal to build wall around condo tower

Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

This developer isn’t building amity with its Amity Street neighbors!

Cobble Hillers tore into the builder constructing a seven-structure complex on the old Long Island College Hospital campus for proposing to erect a brick wall along Amity Street that will partially block one of its forthcoming high-rises to passersby.

“The least you could do is try to make this barricade inviting to the community,” said Alex Harris, who lives on Hicks Street between Kane and Degraw streets. “This feels extremely exclusive to walk by everyday.”

Brooklyn-based real-estate firm Fortis Property Group proposed building the nine-foot-high barrier along roughly 50 feet of Amity Street sidewalk between Henry and Clinton streets, to enclose the private courtyard with a swimming-pool and garden it plans to build for residents of its 15-story condo tower on Henry Street between Pacific and Amity Streets, dubbed 5 River Park.

That tower is one of the seven buildings Fortis is currently constructing as part of its controversial River Park complex — which it is erecting under existing zoning law after abandoning an attempt to rezone the site to make way for an even larger development in 2016. And the proposed wall surrounding the high-rise, which must be approved by the community board and the Landmarks Preservation Commission because the bit of Amity Street it would run along sits within the protected Cobble Hill Historic District, would seamlessly blend in with its surroundings, the architect of 5 River Park told members of the civic panel.

“We believe it’s a contextual wall that reflects the character of the neighborho­od,” Douglas Romines said during an Oct. 25 meeting of Community Board 6’s Land Use and Landmarks Committee.

But many of the locals, along with some Cobble Hill pols, strongly disagreed, and the local Assemblywoman accused the developer of trying to sneak its barricade past the board by first seeking approval from the landmarks commission, so that it would be harder for the panel to reject the proposal.

“The developer went first to LPC with the hope it would simply be able to get approval without going through the community board,” said Assemblywoman Jo Anne Simon (D–Cobble Hill). “It is unacceptab­le.”

Simon and Councilman Brad Lander (D–Cobble Hill) issued statements urging the committee to pan Fortis’s request — which it did nearly unanimously, along with demanding the builder restore a wrought-iron fence on the property that its workers allegedly ripped out without permission, and requesting the city look over the developer’s plans for its on-site pool.

And any future wall that Fortis may propose should be opaque enough to let passersby peek in from the sidewalk, instead of entirely blocking neighbors’ view, according to Lander.

“If something’s going to be added to the community, I think something that shows the garden might be great — at least provide visual enhancement,” he said.

Following the meeting, Fortis bigwigs pulled their current wall proposal, and now plan to revise it using the board’s feedback, according to a rep.

“We withdrew the application and are working with the community to reissue a design with community input,” said Dale Laplace.

And two days before the locals clashed with the developer over the barricade it wants to put outside 5 River Park, Fortis honchos hosted a swanky liquor-soaked party on Amity Street featuring two bars, hors d’oeuvres, and a live band to launch sales of the condos inside the luxury tower — the first to rise within the builder’s larger complex rising on land by Atlantic Avenue and Hicks, Columbia, and Pacific streets.

Reach reporter Julianne Cuba at (718) 260–4577 or by e-mail at jcuba@cnglocal.com. Follow her on Twitter @julcuba.
Posted 12:00 am, October 30, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

Hector Padilla from Brooklyn says:
Tear Down The Wall. The developer Wants an exclusive only for the rich enclave, Tear Down The Wall. The developer wants a wall to keep us poor people out , Tear Down The Wall. The developer want a wall to make us poor people look like outsiders , Tear Down The Wall. We are not outsiders and we demand to Tear Down The Wall.
Oct. 30, 2018, 5:45 am
Mike Hewes from Brooklyn H says:
Developer Louis Kestenbaum purchased the LICH property for below market value thanks to Mayor Deblasio and Governor Cuomo . Where is the mayor or the governor now? Why are the tax payers getting shafted twice now , and no opposition from either offices are protecting us tax payers from enjoying the LICH open space ?
Oct. 30, 2018, 7:11 am
Emma Isabella from Brooklyn says:
Lich developer louis Kestenbaum was charged with federal Racketeering charges is an indictment felon, yet Mayor DeBlasio and Gov.Cuomo both were instrumental in having this felon get the Lich property for below market value, we are talking Millions of dollars less , for what? that he should block and gate us all out from the water views or open space? Mayor Deblasio I remember how staunchly you supported Mr louis Kestenbaumin getting him the Lich property for below other bidders , where are you now in stopping him from gating us all out?
Oct. 30, 2018, 8:31 am
Neighbor from Cobble Hill says:
I'd rather have the wall and would prefer extending it around all these out-of-character developments. Think about it, the less we see of this, the better, especially at the street level which is where we are mostly and would want to limit visibility to a max. Put some evergreen shrubs and flowering vines on the thing and it will be far more attractive than the alternative. Think of it this way; they are not wall us out, we are walling them in!
Oct. 30, 2018, 9:11 am
Bob Marvin from Prospect Lefferts Gardens says:
A CONTEXTUAL wall? What nonsense!
Oct. 30, 2018, 10:16 am
Mike from Williamsburg says:
Remember when Brad Lander killed all the affordable housing at this site?
Oct. 30, 2018, 1:42 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: