Bricking around: City set to salvage two brick walls of Gowanus Station in construction of new headhouse on site, Feds say

Still standing: The entirety of the Gowanus Station's Nevins Street facade, and part of the building's wall along Butler Street, will be painstakingly restored after city workers demolish the rest of the building to make way for a water-filtration facility on the site.
Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

The city will painstakingly restore two walls of the Gowanus Station building after razing the rest of the ancient structure to erect a water-filtration facility on the site, according to the Feds leading the cleanse of Brooklyn’s Nautical Purgatory, who recently reached an agreement with state preservationists about what parts of the Station to save.

Workers with the local Department of Environmental Protection will rebuild a 25-to-30-foot portion of the Butler Street building’s wall along that street, and the entirety of its wall along Nevins Street, in order to incorporate both into the design of the headhouse required as part of the canal’s scrub, the man in charge of the job said.

“So dismantling carefully, basically brick-by-brick, the two walls, and then rebuilding them with all the historic elements between the pediment and everything else that’s in there and incorporate them in the new headhouse that will go in place,” Environmental Protection Agency Project Manager Christos Tsiamis said at a Tuesday meeting with local watchdogs in the Gowanus Community Advisory Group — the organization’s first gathering since the longest government shutdown in American history, which left the federally contracted group rudderless for weeks.

The restoration agreement the Feds and leaders of the state’s Office of Historic Preservation reached still must be signed off on by federal officials with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, but Tsiamis told the Gowanusaurs the scheme is in its final stages, and that his environmental-agency bosses have the final say.

But one preservationist — who with other locals last year unsuccessfully pushed the city to landmark the 1913-built Station to spare it from the wrecking ball — claimed the language in the new agreement is too vague, and gives the city too much leeway when it comes to what workers may actually salvage.

“There’s a bunch of weasel language that says, ‘And to the extent practical, preserve the materials.’ If you give an inch, as we have learned, a mile will be taken, and there’s a chance that nothing will be preserved,” said Brad Vogel, a member of preservationist group the Gowanus Landmarking Coalition.

And the agreement also falsely described the building’s demolition as unavoidable, according to Vogel, who previously argued that the headhouse, and an adjacent open-air public space planned to rise on land the city last year approved the use of eminent domain to seize, could be built without destroying the Station.

“I just think there’s things in here in this draft that are quite concerning, such as, ‘There appear to be no prudent and feasible alternatives to demolition.’ I just don’t think that’s accurate,” he said. “If it’s concerns about the cost and the risk of collapse then state those, this is very broad blanket language that I don’t think is accurate or justified.”

The headhouse and public space will sit on Nevins and Butler street lots, on top of infrastructure buried below ground to collect storm-water run-off when the canal floods during heavy rains.

For years, plans for that infrastructure called for two massive tanks — one of which would sit beneath the headhouse, and the other below ground on city-owned land near Second Avenue and the Fourth Street Turning Basin. But the city recently proposed building a giant subterranean tunnel instead of the cisterns, prompting Community Advisory Group members to fire off a letter demanding the Gowanus Station be preserved in full if officials swap tube for tanks — a plan the Feds have yet to approve, according to Tsiamis.

Another local, however, applauded the agreement’s terms to save the two Station walls, given the fact that officials did not need to preserve any of it because it is not landmarked.

“I’m delighted that, if I’m understanding it correctly, the whole Nevins Street facade, all two stories plus pediment will be reconstruc­ted,” said Peter Reich.

It is not yet clear how designers with the Department of Environmental Protection will incorporate the salvaged walls into the headhouse design, according to Tsiamis, who noted his agency is not involved in that process, but encouraged locals to share ideas with the city officials that are.

“The EPA will not be involved, our mandate does not include architectural issues, but I believe that the community would be very happy to get engaged,” Tsiamis said.

Reach reporter Kevin Duggan at (718) 260–2511 or by e-mail at Follow him on Twitter @kduggan16.
Updated 12:01 pm, February 28, 2019
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Mike from Williamsburg says:
Because this building is twice as ugly as others, it's twice as important to preserve it.
Feb. 28, 2019, 3:08 pm
Ms. Me from Bay Ridge says:
For once I agree with Mike. I'm all for historic preservation but that building does not look all that special. Incorporating the pediment elements into a new structure should be enough.
March 1, 2019, 8:10 am
Ms. Me from Bay Ridge says:
I used to give out handys to the homeless behind that building.
March 1, 2019, 11:09 am
Mr. ME from the future says:
The building along with the first ASPCA headquarters across the street mark an important piece of Brooklyn History--the building of Brooklyn before the car and trucking industry existed. The building was a horse stable and the ASPCA building was a veterinarian service for the cart horses- the first of its kind. The building had an adjoining pipe yard where the new water distribution pipes for drinking water were unloaded from barges to be distributed and installed across a growing Brooklyn. And the pediment, naming NYC, was an early municipal act following Brooklyn's incorporation into NYC.
March 4, 2019, 7:45 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: