Sections

Growing concerns: Height worries dominate city’s latest Gowanus rezoning meeting

Demanding answers: More than a dozen residents lined up to ask city planners about the Gowanus rezoning at Community Board 6’s Land Use Committee on Feb. 28, with the taller height limits at the top of many locals’ concerns.
Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

The city must scale back some of the new building-height limits officials proposed in their scheme to rezone a massive swath of Gowanus, locals demanded, because erecting structures as tall as 22- and 30-stories along parts of its namesake canal could physically divide the area much like the Brooklyn–Queens Expressway did in Cobble Hill when workers laid the roadway through that neighborhood.

“We have a large ditch, which cuts our community board right down Hicks Street — it’s I-278,” said Carroll Gardener Steve Fontes, referring to the local Community Board 6, whose district includes his neighborhood, Cobble Hill, and Gowanus, among others. “When I looked at your canal zoning area I couldn’t help but think that it was the same effect, but in reverse.”

Fontes joined Gowanusaurs and other locals at packed Feb. 28 meeting of CB6’s Land Use Committee, where officials from the Department of City Planning formally talked through the rezoning proposal, weeks after the last public meeting about the scheme descended into chaos over its lack of an official presentation.

And following the lengthy spiel, dozens of attendees queued up at a microphone to query the presenters, lobbing concerns that predominantly centered on the proposed new height limits.

Officials’ latest proposal calls for rezoning plots along the noxious canal to make way for mixed-use buildings as high as 22 stories, and one similar structure as high as 30 stories on a lot at the corner of Huntington and Smith streets, which would include residential and commercial space. But currently, the tallest building closest to those plots, at 505 Court St., only rises roughly 12 stories, according to Fontes, who urged the city planners to think smaller.

“I’m really concerned about the height, you’re going to have these enormous buildings — the height of buildings Downtown — lining the canal,” he said. “There is nothing contextual about that, not even close. It’s horrible. Are these zonings set in stone?”

Another resident doubled down on Fontes’s concerns, pushing the scheme’s project manager Jonathan Keller to explain why its latest version proposes the 22- and 30-story height limits when an earlier iteration released last summer did not specifically call for structures that tall.

“That proposal was pretty much the same as this, but back then the towers maxed out at 14 stories high,” said Debbie Stoller, who attended on behalf of activist group The Gowanus Rezoning is Dirty Politics.

Stoller, who claimed that locals expressed fears about new height restrictions during the community meetings officials held while shaping their scheme, then accused the city of bowing down to builders in changing the plans to accommodate taller towers.

“The height came up in all of the Gowanus meetings, so I want to know what happened — who sold out the neighborhood? Why is it what the community decides, developers can override,” she said.

Keller assured that the city is taking community feedback seriously, adding that in order to create more so-called affordable housing and implement other infrastructure improvements, officials needed to allow for more development.

But the project manager — who argued that the increased height limit is not completely out of context for the neighborhood, given the tallest 14-story buildings within its public Gowanus Houses complex — confirmed the rezoning scheme is not yet final, and that there is still time to tweak it.

“When you’re trying to promote a number of things, including remediation, affordable housing, non-residential uses, and activating the shoreline, raising it up for sea level rise, that requires development,” Keller said. “This is a proposal, it can be shaped, it can be refined, and that’s why we’re also here.”

The height issue along the canal could be solved by allowing developers to build even bigger in a different area included within the overall rezoning site — which includes land generally bounded by Bond Street, Baltic Street, Fourth Avenue, and Huntington, Third, Seventh, and 15th streets — according to another attendee.

The city could accommodate buildings even taller than the previously suggested, 17-story structures it wants to make way for along Fourth Avenue between Pacific and 15th streets, where developers could build more housing on an already bustling thoroughfare close to public transportation, argued attorney Charley Dorsaneo.

“Why is there any height restriction at all on Fourth Avenue? It has transit access, is a wide street — it seems like a great street to not have any height restrictions at all,” said Dorsaneo, who works for a Manhattan-based law firm and is a member of pro-development group Open New York, which advocates for reducing zoning restrictions.

City Planning Department officials plan to return to the community in April, when they will host a scoping meeting where locals can weigh in about the environmental review officials must conduct before the rezoning proposal begins its journey through the Universal Land Use Review Procedure, which it must pass before any regulations can be implemented.

Reach reporter Kevin Duggan at (718) 260–2511 or by e-mail at kduggan@cnglocal.com. Follow him on Twitter @kduggan16.
Updated 2:43 pm, March 6, 2019
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

Mike from Williamsburg says:
Charley Dorsaneo makes a much better point than anyone who thinks taller buildings make crossing a street as hard as crossing a (or under a) highway. The kernel of truth in that argument is that the BQE should be torn down.
March 6, 2019, 3:23 pm
Henry Ford from Bay Ridge says:
Truth: The BQE should be torn down.
March 6, 2019, 3:43 pm
Mike from Williamsburg says:
And why is Charley Dorsaneo the only one whose profession is named? Debbie Stoller has a much more interesting one. She even has a wikipedia page.
March 6, 2019, 3:45 pm
Stan the man from Boerum Hill says:
30 stories? I will take 30 stories every day over the 80 stories that 80 Flatbush was approved for...
March 6, 2019, 7:59 pm
AC from Upper West Side says:
Again, outsider here, but should we really squander any possibility for quality development by focusing solely on height? Honestly, a rezoning of this caliber in my neighborhood would garner the same response, but I would argue instead of being concerned about height exclusively, actually incentivize developers and builder to offer what is sorely needed in the specific neighborhoods, and across the city: affordable housing, quality schooling facilities, green spaces, all three wrapped into a single project. I'm not saying there shouldn't be a limit - the limit proposed is actually a solid one, but the complaints are about context, without asking, or considering, what is being offered in this kind of project, or what could be offered. I always say this: what goes in matters far more than what goes up.
March 6, 2019, 8:45 pm
David the Addict from Kings County says:
All of this new development is going to go bankrupt. And we will be left with empty money pit shells. If this were strictly for affordable housing, then I’d wouldn’t be so apprehensive; there are plenty of folks who genuinely need it and would give rent to cover costs. I’m not so sure about the amount of 7 digit and higher up earners who these developers feel will buy & rent as if they were the Hebrews walking into the Promised Land; all I see is the destruction of the Golden Calf.
March 6, 2019, 11:02 pm
Joe from Gowanus says:
Why is our community so focused on building height? An 8 story and 30 story building has the same affect on the Gowanus street they front. The top of Flatbush Ave towers can been seen from Boerum Hill $10M brownstones. Is the concern that tops of Gowanus buildings may be seen from backyards of expensive homes in Carroll Gardens and Park Slope? That seems like a minor annoyance for developing 4,000 new affordable Gowanus apartments.
March 7, 2019, 8:54 am
Stan from Boerum Hill says:
Its really not the height its the bulk and how the 800 or so apartments in ONE building effect us all...how it effects the infrastructure schools etc. I tired of being told that it because of concentration of the already overburdened mass transit system. 80 Flatbush is being built without ANY parking...where will the deliveries go?
March 7, 2019, 9:53 am
Stan from Boerum Hill says:
https://newyorkyimby.com/2018/09/80-flatbush-redesigned-and-approved-tallest-tower-scaled-back-to-840.html
March 7, 2019, 9:54 am

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: