A BQ-Plan: Renowned architectural firm unveils large-scale BQE park proposal

A big plan: Dumbo-based Bjarke Ingels Group unveiled its proposal to turn the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway triple-cantilever into a new park called the BQP.
Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Call it the BQP!

A world-famous architecture firm has proposed to turn the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway into an ambitious 10-acre park on top of a capped highway, calling it the Brooklyn-Queens Park — or BQP.

Architects with the Dumbo-based Bjarke Ingels Group on Tuesday released a plan — which they produced pro-bono — to build a six-lane highway along the back of Brooklyn Bridge Park on Furman Street at ground level, and cap it off in order to build a new park on top.

The designers proposed to spare the beloved Brooklyn Heights Promenade and repurpose the existing cantilever into either a tiered park – similar to the “Tri-line” park idea proposed by Heights local Mark Baker – or demolish the two lower levels and recycle the debris into an artificial cliff side if the aged structure proves too expensive to retain, according to the firm’s planner spearheading the proposal.

“We would be able to use the BQE rubble to create a newly-reconstructed cliff side, naturalized, with [Americans with Disabilities Act] ramps, bringing you down and connecting from the Brooklyn Heights Promenade to Brooklyn Bridge Park in a way that it hasn’t been for a long time,” said Jeremy Alain Siegel.

The new park could also allow for Mayor de Blasio’s beloved Brooklyn-Queens Connector to run along the lowest level, next to a two-lane Furman Street for cars, as well as an indoor parking garage underneath the promenade, renderings show.

Engineers from the firm’s partner organization Arcadis deemed that theirs is the most straightforward way to deal with the reconstruction because builders would only have to construct a new roadway once without having to take it back down afterwards, and the road would be at ground level instead of the city’s proposed 50 feet height — possibly making it a cheaper and faster process, according to the architect.

“We think that we could very likely do this at the same or a reduced timetable and also at the same or reduced cost,” he said.

Siegel and his team are considering extending the park to the Cobble Hill trench section of the roadway at Atlantic Avenue, which could even allow for a future walkway from Brooklyn Bridge to Red Hook if the city decides to cap that trench, according to the Brooklyn Heights resident.

“If you were able to do that you would be creating a linear park that connects you from the Brooklyn Bridge all the way to Red Hook, which would be quite an amazing thing,” Siegel said.

The firm’s founder, Bjarke Ingels, will also be moving to the upscale Heights soon, according to Siegel, so he could end up having his own company’s creation in his back yard.

The only difficulty with their plan is that the city agency would have to go beyond their remit and partner with the state and Brooklyn Bridge Park, but Siegel believes that a plan as convincing as theirs could gather enough public support and momentum to spur the departments into action and overcome bureaucratic hurdles.

“They have a critical life safety on their hands, they want to make sure the whole thing doesn’t get snagged in approvals and coordinations and so they’ve been trying to stay as much in DOT right-of-way and DOT jurisdiction as possible,” he said. “If people can really come around to that idea then that coordination will not be such a headache, it will be something that is demanded and something that has to happen to make the right decision here.”

The project group designed the proposal to accommodate the same amount of traffic that the department planned for, but planners may be able to reduce the road to four lanes if traffic flow decreases as a result of new statewide policies, according to a new report by a Tri-state research organization.

The Regional Plan Association, which worked together with Bjarke Ingels Group on the BQE plan — and also has a rep on the mayor’s new expert panel for the project — released a report on April 2 that five policy changes could reduce traffic on the roadway.

The association’s report argues that the state’s recently-approved congestion pricing, along with their proposed high occupancy vehicle policies, splitting bridge tolls equally for both directions, and reducing lanes will decrease traffic by as much as 25 percent during the expressway’s reconstruction.

Siegel said his team took the report’s numbers into consideration but said that their plan would work even if the current vehicle volumes persist.

“We wanted to prove the feasibility of a six-lane configuration in the case that that would be what was deemed necessary. However, if we are able to reduce to five or four lanes as RPA has been proposing, it would make this scheme just that more feasible and less expensive,” he said.

Reach reporter Kevin Duggan at (718) 260–2511 or by e-mail at Follow him on Twitter @kduggan16.
Updated 2:02 pm, April 4, 2019
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Alex from Coney says:
WOW!!! Amazing redevelopment idea.
April 4, 2019, 1:19 pm
Tal Barzilai from Pleasantville, NY says:
This idea is most likely very expensive and unrealistic, plus let's not forget how and why the Westway didn't happen.
April 4, 2019, 2:55 pm
Mike from Williamsburg says:
Great idea except for the 6 lane highway.
April 4, 2019, 3:24 pm
Ms. Me from Bay Ridge says:
I wonder why there would be money for that but there has never been money to bury the elevated Gowanus under Third Avenue. Any guesses anyone?
April 4, 2019, 3:47 pm
Sid from Boerum hill says:
Tal-its less expensive than the two plans put forward by the DOT which they committed the money to. Maybe it should be just two lanes in each direction.
April 4, 2019, 11:23 pm
Dan from BH says:
The biggest cost in most construction projects is labor and if you are working on an elevated platform, labor costs increase dramatically as everything takes way more time. It wouldn't be surprising if this plan was significantly cheaper than the original design.
April 5, 2019, 6:55 am
AC from Upper West Side says:
And this is why I love Bjarke Ingels
April 5, 2019, 7:32 am
Kieran from Cobble Hill says:
Private initiative will always trump government hackdom! This professional brilliance is pro bono and took weeks, not the years of dull input and huge expense the DOT's dreary plan took. The only problem I have with this great imagining is giving room for Developer de Blasio's $4 billion BQX tram to luxury skyscrapers.
April 5, 2019, 8:18 am
HH from BH says:
Theoretically a great idea but does anyone know where cars enter and exit on the BH/Dumbo side? There are buildings - residential, hotel, offices- on Furman Street so it couldn’t just easily be expanded to accommodate the traffic flow for 6 lanes?
April 5, 2019, 8:19 am
Brooklyn from Brooklyn says:
Great plan. But no plan should be considered until it is fully incorporated into decking over Atlantic Ave across the ditch in Cobble Hill & Carroll Gardens to Red Hook. One continuous development/improvement. All exhaust outlets would have to be filtered. Nonetheless, a tunnel continuing from the ditch going under Brooklyn Heights is the far better choice. Existing trains could be reconfigured/moved to accommodate (just as they did in Boston's Big Dig). This would free up the cantilever to be a beautiful river-walk with cafe's, small shops and the likes. And the tunnel could be built without detouring traffic. And it should be 8 lanes! Let's not pretend we can live without road transportation till we can.
April 5, 2019, 8:19 am
Benny from Park Slope says:
Every legitimate study on traffic patterns over the past several decades has reached the same conclusion: Increased road capacity leads to MORE traffic, not less. Stop calling for "more lanes" and look to other countries all over the world that are finding creative, efficient, and eco-friendly ways to decrease congestion, air pollution, and car-related deaths in urban areas. Why is America so f---ing stupid and old-fashioned when it comes to transportation?
April 5, 2019, 8:42 am
Jaundiced from Fulton Ferry says:
Let's see... lowest level 2-way Furman Street (with local access/egress), next level six (eight?) lanes cut and cover BQE (with local access/egress), next multi-level interior parking garage. Sounds complicated, like the sort of slight of hand expected from a 'BIG' design group. How about a stiff Heights flip-tax to pay for it all?
April 5, 2019, 8:49 am
Chad from Fort Greene says:
Tractor trailer trucks do not belong in an urban environment. Ban trucks in NYC and kill the BQE with fire.
April 5, 2019, 10:02 am
Jim from Cobble Hill says:
The BQX needs to be raised, like a monorail for the majority of its entire length. Otherwise it's just a glorified bus.
April 5, 2019, 2:28 pm
scp36 from Sunset Park says:
This is essentially the same as the Tri-Line idea proposed earlier: Almost seems like Bjarke-Ingels stole that idea..
April 5, 2019, 2:33 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: