Sections

Developer offers Gowanus an $11 million accessible subway station in exchange for larger building

New digs: Manhattan-based development company Avery Hall Investment offered to build a more accessible entrance to the Bay Ridge-bound platform of the R train’s Union Street station in exchange for almost a football field’s worth of additional floor space, at an April 25 meeting.
Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

A developer offered to fund the construction of a more accessible subway station entrance to the R-train in Gowanus in return for a larger building at a Department of City Planning meeting last week.

Manhattan-based Avery Hall Investments will foot the bill to design and build a new entrance to the Bay Ridge-bound platform of the Union Street station with a new elevator and wider stairway at a cost of $11 million in exchange for a city zoning code transit improvement incentive that would allow the company to add almost a football field’s worth of floorspace to a building they propose to erect on top of the new stop, reps said at the public scoping meeting held April 25 at Park Slope’s MS 51 on Fifth Avenue.

The new entrance would be easier for Gowanusaurs to access than the current stairway, which is often clogged during peak hours, according to a spokesman.

“We believe that our proposal aligns with the rezoning’s goals in modernizing this outmoded subway station, and most importantly making it accessible to frail elderly, parents with young children and strollers, and Brooklynites with disabilities, especially during evening rush hours when the current narrow sidewalk stair is overcrowded and difficult to navigate,” said the company’s chief Brian Ezra at the school’s auditorium at Fourth Street.

The developer, which has properties in Carroll Gardens, Cobble Hill, and Downtown, plans to build the new entrance at the base of a residential building they propose to construct at the northern corner of Union Street and Fourth Avenue — at the site of a gas station.

Under the rezoning, they could erect a 17-story tower with an area that spans nearly three football fields.

They would be able to add the extra space they’re asking for within the existing building envelope, which is the maximum three-dimensional space on a lot within which they can build the structure, including its height, setback, and yard controls, and without going over 17 stories, spokesman Ethan Geto said.

The city gave a similar incentive to developers during a Manhattan rezoning in 2016, according to a Gothamist report.

City planners invited the public to give its input into the rezoning’s Environmental Impact Statement, which will assess the potential effects of allowing for taller buildings in Gowanus, among other changes, and is part of the Uniform Land Use Review Procedure bureaucrats must pass before buildings can soar higher.

Residents and local pols demanded that the city carefully study the impact that bringing more people to the neighborhood will have on the current combined sewer overflow issues and that it not compromise the Environmental Protection Agency’s cleanup of Brooklyn’s Nautical Purgatory under the federal Superfund program.

One state pol criticized the city’s draft impact statement and warned that the EPA’s cleanup only accounts for current residents, which could cause issues for the thousands of newcomers the city expects under the rezoning.

“I don’t see how the city can expect it to become a model green neighborhood without keeping to look at the CSO problem we have,” said Assemblywoman Jo Anne Simon (D-Gowanus). “My biggest concern is that if this plan is built out to the fullest there will be 18,000 new residents who – along with the current residents – will be living a very, very troubled site.”

One local historian noted that the canal has been polluted by human waste for more than a century, and urged the city to first clean it before bringing in more people.

“The first time that I found a report about the Gowanus Canal and raw sewage pouring into it is 1864. When are we going to have no more s--- running into this canal? Maybe before the rezone,” said Joseph Alexiou. “Why are we putting the priority of building these buildings first, it’s confusing to me.”

These calls were echoed by representatives of the community watchdog organization the Gowanus Community Advisory Group, which previously formulated their concern with the city’s move, with one of its members saying it could lead to long-term problems akin to the complex repairs of the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway.

Reach reporter Kevin Duggan at (718) 260–2511 or by e-mail at kduggan@cnglocal.com. Follow him on Twitter @kduggan16.
Updated 1:09 pm, May 1, 2019
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reasonable discourse

Mike from Williamsburg says:
This is a win-win idea. I hope it happens.
May 1, 2019, 12:28 pm
Fujimora Mitsukoshi from Shinjuku says:
Haha, these hypocrites are worried about the impact of bringing in more people to the neighborhood but they have no problem with open borders with millions of illegals pouring in, probably heading straight to NYC!
May 1, 2019, 3:01 pm
Jim from Cobble Hill says:
If they are going to make a new entrance for half the station (as proposed) then they can have half the space they want.
May 2, 2019, 6:21 am
MJ from Kensington says:
Laughable. Fancy entrance to the Bay Ridge-bound "R"...NO need. 99% use this station as an exit. Could possibly justify if it was on the Manhattan-bound side. Guess the Speedway gas station, like so many others after they bought out Hess, is going to shut down soon. Let's respect the current 12-story limit and mitigate the potential impact, as Ms. Simon acknowledges.
May 2, 2019, 9:37 am
The Hunkster from Bed-Stuy says:
Why not the real estate developers are using their own money to make their subway stations at their property ADA accessible?
May 2, 2019, 10:48 am
Ro from Pete says:
No, thank you. To both. Keep Union Street buildings from competing with those downtown eyesores.
May 2, 2019, 11:37 am
Mike from Williamsburg says:
I -cannot- get over MJ thinking it's "laughable" to upgrade somewhere that people come out of instead go into. A regular commuter will use either one once per day. But that's "laughable." All the people who enter the station on the Manhattan-bound side will come home after work and use the upgraded station. And that is just ridiculous to MJ.
May 2, 2019, 1:06 pm
Joey from Greenpointy says:
Bigger is always better. You can get more people in there then. The right people of course, not just anybody, of course ;)
May 3, 2019, 1:03 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: