Former Community Board district manager defends bogus pay-raises in court

Camera shy: Hammerman dodged cameras on his way out of the courtroom.
Brooklyn Paper
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

A former Gowanus community board manager testified in Brooklyn Supreme Court on June 11 that he believed he had permission to use his colleagues’ signatures to grant himself multiple pay-raises.

Craig Hammerman, the 27-year former district manager of Community Board 6, faces up to seven years behind bars after using the John Hancock of two former board chairmen in multiple letters to the city to secure salary bumps.

Hammerman took the stand before Supreme Court Justice Donald Leo to tell the jury that he had been authorized to use the signatures for community board business, as he did in four bogus letters to the city, between May 2015 and October 2017, which increased his salary from $105,180 to $121,931.

“I believed I had the authority to act on my own,” Hammerman told the jury. “I didn’t think I had to ask.”

One of the letters was purportedly signed by former-Chairman Gary Reilly, who acknowledged to the jury on June 7 that he had given Hammerman a scan of his signature. He said he assumed that Hammerman would only use it for everyday business matters such as refilling office supplies or corresponding with liquor license applicants the board deals with on a regular basis.

“I thought it was implicit that it was for the sake of convenience,” Reilly told prosecuting attorney Adam Libove.

Reilly admitted that the two men never discussed formal limits on Hammerman’s use of the signature, but told the jury that he had been unaware of his involvement in salary decisions.

“I didn’t know that I had anything to do with raises at the time,” he said. “It never came up.”

Yet in May 2015, the Office of Management and Budget — the agency in charge of allocating the city’s funds — received a letter, which was supposedly signed by Reilly, asking for a five percent increase in salary for Hammerman and two other board employees, according Eileen Galarneau, the city rep who approved the raise.

During trial testimony, Reilly said he had never heard about that letter, and that he neither wrote nor signed it.

Hammerman conceded that he did not get Reilly’s express authorization for the letter, but said he felt that it was within his purview to use the signature to essentially grant himself a raise.

“It was tradition, custom, and practice of the board to pass along raises without explicit approval of the board,” he said.

Reilly, an attorney, had served as the chair of the board — a quasi-governmental body of volunteers which covers Gowanus, Park Slope, Carroll Gardens, Cobble Hill, Columbia Waterfront, and Red Hook — for little more than a year in 2015 and stepped down the following year when he moved upstate, he told the court.

After his resignation, Reilly was succeeded as chairman by Sayar Lonial, whose signature appears on three other pay-raise related documents, which Lonial also knew nothing about.

Members of the civic group discovered their manager’s scheme during an internal review, which eventually led to the District Attorney Eric Gonzalez launching a case against him in May 2018, this paper reported at the time.

The internal review came while Hammerman was on a six-month hiatus after he was arrested in 2017 on stalking charges, which officials later dropped.

The presiding judge barred prosecutors from questioning Hammeran about the stalking arrest at his trial testimony, during which he claimed that his pay-raise actions were meant to benefit the board’s two other paid employees — the assistant district manager and the office manager.

“I wanted to make sure that my staff members received it,” said Hammerman. “It was almost immaterial to me.”

But despite Hammerman’s stated uninterest in his personal salary increase, he stood to gain substantially.

The four total sham documents lead to a $16,751 annual salary bump, which also increased Hammerman’s city pension by almost $10,000 per year, an official with the city’s retirement system told the court.

Hammerman’s retirement benefits swelled from $60,499 to $70,134, which he is set to receive every year from the age of 62 until his death, according Bruce Farbstein of the city’s Employee Retirement System.

The district manager is one of the few paid positions on the board that is made up almost entirely by volunteers, including the chair.

During their various turns on the witness stand, Reilly and Lonial seems to differ on whether Hammerman deserved the raise in the first place.

Lonial claimed told the court that, if asked, he would not have signed off on Hammerman’s raise request. By contrast, Reilly said that he thought that Hammerman did a good job as district manager, something he put in writing on Hammerman’s LinkedIn page in 2011, where wrote that the board was lucky to have a manager with such longtime experience.

“I can’t emphasize enough how important it is to the work of CB6 to have a District Manager of Craig’s caliber. We are lucky to have him,” Reilly wrote on the business-oriented social media site. “Craig possesses a wealth of institutional knowledge on the issues affecting our community, the history of our neighborhoods, and the paths to navigate in the City’s bureaucracy.”

By the end of his tenure, Hammerman was the third-highest paid district manager of all 18 community boards in the borough, surpassed only by Community Board 18’s Dottie Turano, who raked in a staggering $154,725 in 2017, and Community Board 1’s Gerald Esposito, who collected $126,882.

The average salary for managers across the five boroughs was $92,000 at the time, according to Galarneau.

The latter board recently came into hot water when it spent $26,000 to buy an SUV by using a $42,500 Council grant meant to boost the city’s 59 cash-strapped boards, The City reported.

Hammerman’s trial in ongoing. If convicted by the jury, Hammerman would face seven years in prison at sentencing for the pay-raise scheme.

Updated 12:32 pm, June 12, 2019
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reasonable discourse

Reginald Culver says:
Community boards are established in Chapter 70 of the New York City Charter. There is nothing "quasi" governmental about them. The 59 New York City community boards are independent, non-mayoral city agencies.
June 10, 2019, 4:53 pm
Tyler from pps says:
How about quasi-useful or quasi-effectual?
June 11, 2019, 11:09 am
Local from Here says:
That man is a local hero and it is my civic duty to suck him dry while playing his rusty trombone. I will be god dammed if anyone tells me otherwise.
June 11, 2019, 8:28 pm
Local from Here says:
??There is living rent free in someone’s head then there is this. All the reasons why vision zero is safely locked away in a facility here in one comment section. ??
June 11, 2019, 8:47 pm
Local from Here says:
My Comment before the above makes no sense. I must have eaten out my mom after she went on a meth bender. Sorry.
June 11, 2019, 9:40 pm
Former CB person from Carroll Gardens says:
Community Board Members, unlike committee members, are appointed by politicians. These people represent the city council person or the borough president who appointed them so the author is correct: Community Boards are quasi governmental. Recall when CB6 board members voted against Atlantic Yards and against housing inside of Brooklyn Bridge Park - the politicians removed the Chair and 8 others on the Board as retribution for going against the political will for those projects.
June 12, 2019, 6:54 am
Crime doesn't pay from NYC says:
This guy's a crook and crooks go to jail. Worse yet, he stole from the government which is stealing from the public, the very same people he pretended to be serving. A real manipulator, no different than his stalking excuses, why would anyone believe a grown man in a public position thought he didn't need approval for a raise. "Let's see, do I deserve a raise' sure why not, I'm approved". Come on Craig - how stupid do you think we are.
June 12, 2019, 9:39 am
Bill from Cobble Hill says:
This is outrageous. They should throw the book at him. Maximum penalty and no less. A liar, a thief and the most arrogant ED ever.
June 12, 2019, 11:59 am
Jeff from Red Hook says:
Arrogant to the point he thought the theft would never come to light. He may have done good work many years ago, but this bozo has been on cruise control for years. Married while stalking other women to the point of 3 arrests. Loved the limelight. Bet he doesn’t love it now. Never returns calls. Never answers emails. Never answers the phone. Good riddance!
June 12, 2019, 12:18 pm
Monty from Springfield says:
June 12, 2019, 5:07 pm
Donald from Jay St says:
Not guilty after trial
June 14, 2019, 5:05 pm

Comments closed.

First name
Last name
Your neighborhood
Email address
Daytime phone

Your letter must be signed and include all of the information requested above. (Only your name and neighborhood are published with the letter.) Letters should be as brief as possible; while they may discuss any topic of interest to our readers, priority will be given to letters that relate to stories covered by The Brooklyn Paper.

Letters will be edited at the sole discretion of the editor, may be published in whole or part in any media, and upon publication become the property of The Brooklyn Paper. The earlier in the week you send your letter, the better.

Keep it local!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: